
While not Bill Ackman's only rationale, the claim with the above chart seems to be that with required appreciation only ~4% (down from 9%+ in the early 1980's), the rental equivalent value hasn't been this cheap since the 1970's.
My problem?
My problem?
Well for one, I am questioning Bill Ackman (not typically the best move).
But ignoring that, my problem is this does not compare the "real" appreciation needed now to "real" appreciation needed in the early 1980's, but only nominal. Nominal appreciation was easy in the early 1980's when inflation was running at 10%+, but not so much with current inflation thus far non-existent.
Want proof that inflation matters to home values? Here you go.

Is housing a good hedge against potential inflation? Sure. But it may not be so cheap should inflation not show itself.
Source: Irrational Exuberance
0 Response to "Housing and Inflation"
Post a Comment