The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute today released the annual county health rankings. The rankings are a good resource for assessing a county's overall health status and for comparing counties within the same state. "The rankings look at many interconnected factors that influence community health including education, jobs, smoking, physical inactivity and access to health care," Donald Schwarz reports for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. "This year, we added a new measure on residential segregation to help communities see where disparities may cluster because some neighborhoods or areas have been cut off from opportunities and investments that fuel good health." (Example: Overall rankings in West Virginia)
Counties are ranked relative to the health of other counties in the same state and are based on eight factors: overall health outcomes; length of life, quality of life; overall health factors; health behaviors; clinical care; social and economic factors; and physical environment, states the report. "The overall health outcomes summary score is a weighted composite of length of life (50 percent) and quality of life (50 percent). The overall health factors summary score is a weighted composite of four components: health behaviors (30 percent), clinical care (20 percent), social and economic factors (40 percent), and physical environment (10 percent). The component weights for Health Outcomes and Health Factors each add to 100 percent." (Rural areas had some of the worst numbers)
Rural areas didn't score well in this year's rankings, receiving high scores in areas such as tobacco use, teen births and preventable hospital stays, Sarah Hedgecock reports for Forbes. Schwarz told her, “The lack of improvement in health in rural counties while other counties have shown improvement over the last almost two decades was shocking to see."
One area rural areas did poorly was in premature death rates, with those numbers worsening in one of out of every five counties, Hedgecock writes. Bridget Catlin, a senior scientist at the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute and author of the report, told her, “There really is no one single factor that is contributing to the situation in rural counties. It’s not just access to healthcare." To search the rankings by state, click here.
Rural areas didn't score well in this year's rankings, receiving high scores in areas such as tobacco use, teen births and preventable hospital stays, Sarah Hedgecock reports for Forbes. Schwarz told her, “The lack of improvement in health in rural counties while other counties have shown improvement over the last almost two decades was shocking to see."
One area rural areas did poorly was in premature death rates, with those numbers worsening in one of out of every five counties, Hedgecock writes. Bridget Catlin, a senior scientist at the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute and author of the report, told her, “There really is no one single factor that is contributing to the situation in rural counties. It’s not just access to healthcare." To search the rankings by state, click here.
from The Rural Blog http://ift.tt/1M8cP6F County health rankings released; rural areas scored poorly in many areas - Entrepreneur Generations
Related Posts :
Black farmers the least likely to get USDA direct loans over past three years, also got lower share of pandemic relief - Entrepreneur Generations
New analysis of 2020 votes shows Trump got a bigger slice of rural votes than exit polls had shown - Entrepreneur Generations- Rural N.C. editor jailed over reporter's use of recorder in court - Entrepreneur Generations
- Justice Department announces funding for body cameras for rural and tribal law enforcement - Entrepreneur Generations
- Coal bounces back, probably briefly, as economies rebound - Entrepreneur Generations
0 Response to "County health rankings released; rural areas scored poorly in many areas - Entrepreneur Generations"
Post a Comment