But that may not be the case. Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva, the ranking member of the Committee on Natural Resources, sent a letter to Interior Sec. Ryan Zinke in October demanding an explanation of the fate of the remaining $400,000 in funds for the study, which had a $1 million budget. "According to Rep. Grijalva’s letter, no other studies have been halted as a result of budget review by the Department of Interior of grants over $100,000. Arizona’s Representative expressed concern that the reasons behind the research’s cancellation might be driven by ideology and not fiscal responsibility," Jan Pytalski reports for 100 Days in Appalachia.
Appalachian Voices graphic; click on the image to enlarge it. |
"In his letter, Rep. Grijalva recalls a joint call for the reinstitution of the study with Representatives Frank Pallone (D–N.J.), ranking member of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, John Yarmuth (D–KY.), ranking member of the Committee on Budget, Don Beyer (D–VA.) and Donald McEachin (D–VA.). The letter was sent by the Representatives one week after the August 18 decision to halt the study. As of press time it remains unanswered," Pytalski reports.
from The Rural Blog http://ift.tt/2hzsyQB Questions about halted strip mining impact study in Appalachia - Entrepreneur Generations
0 Response to "Questions about halted strip mining impact study in Appalachia - Entrepreneur Generations"
Post a Comment