When a federal study on the public health impacts of mountain top removal mining in Central Appalachia was cancelled in August, the
Department of the Interior said it wasn't because of the subject of the study. All projects costing more than $100,000 were being reviewed because of budget cuts, the Interior's
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement said in a
statement.
But that may not be the case. Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva, the ranking member of the
Committee on Natural Resources, sent a letter to Interior Sec. Ryan Zinke in October demanding an explanation of the fate of the remaining $400,000 in funds for the study, which had a $1 million budget. "According to Rep. Grijalva’s letter, no other studies have been halted as a result of budget review by the Department of Interior of grants over $100,000. Arizona’s Representative expressed concern that the reasons behind the research’s cancellation might be driven by ideology and not fiscal responsibility," Jan Pytalski
reports for
100 Days in Appalachia.
 |
Appalachian Voices graphic; click on the image to enlarge it. |
"It increasingly appears as if DOI ended the study because of fears that it would conclusively show that mountaintop removal (MTR) coal mining is a serious threat to the health of people living in Appalachia," Grijalva wrote in the letter. "Cutting off funding for a scientific study because it will likely produce uncomfortable results for powerful Administration allies is unconscionable, especially when these political games are affecting public health. Sadly, as we have seen so far this year, this Administration routinely suppresses science that doesn’t agree with its ideology."
"In his letter, Rep. Grijalva recalls a joint call for the reinstitution of the study with Representatives Frank Pallone (D–N.J.), ranking member of the
House Committee on Energy and Commerce, John Yarmuth (D–KY.), ranking member of the
Committee on Budget, Don Beyer (D–VA.) and Donald McEachin (D–VA.). The letter was sent by the Representatives one week after the August 18 decision to halt the study. As of press time it remains unanswered," Pytalski reports.
from The Rural Blog http://ift.tt/2hzsyQB Questions about halted strip mining impact study in Appalachia -
Entrepreneur Generations
Related Posts :
BLM says it will not heed advisory council's recommendation to kill 45,000 wild horses - Entrepreneur GenerationsThe Bureau of Land Management says it will not kill 45,000 wild horses, as recommended by … Read More...
Alaska offers rural bridge, with $30,000 reward - Entrepreneur Generations
Alaska Department of Transportation photo
A rural remote Alaskan bridge is yours for … Read More...
Many voters, especially Trump supporters, overestimate instances of voter fraud - Entrepreneur Generations
How often registered voters think voter fraud happens
Registered voters, especially … Read More...
University of Wisconsin starts nation's first rural residency program for obstetrician-gynecologists - Entrepreneur GenerationsThe University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology is launching what i… Read More...
Jobs, economy, safety, protests, arrests highlight events surrounding Dakota Access Pipeline - Entrepreneur Generations
Pipeline map colors counties in its route
The Dakota Access Pipeline has caused plenty of … Read More...
0 Response to "Questions about halted strip mining impact study in Appalachia - Entrepreneur Generations"
Post a Comment