![]() |
Washington Post chart |
Support for Republicans was down from 2016 across the board: among rural, suburban and urban voters; among blue and white collar workers; and among voters at all levels of education. "Republicans may have garnered more votes across the battlegrounds, but only by a fraction of a percentage point. That compares with a Trump win of almost six points in 2016," Ted Mellnik and Kevin Schaul report for The Washington Post. "Across racial lines, Republicans won handily in areas that are more than 90 percent white, but by less than half of Trump’s margin. And in majority nonwhite areas, Democratic candidates also won by less than Hillary Clinton two years ago. Both shifts may be related to relative declines in turnout for minority as well as rural voters."
Though President Trump was not on yesterday's ballots, most voters viewed the election as a referendum on his presidency. "Nearly two thirds of voters said they cast their ballot for Congress either to support Trump (26 percent) or oppose him (38 percent). More voters said they were casting a ballot to support Trump than oppose him in Senate races in Missouri, Indiana and North Dakota, three states where Republicans beat Democratic incumbents," Reid Wilson reports for The Hill.
In January, the two parties (and their bases) will likely continue drifting apart and "double down on divisiveness heading into 2020," Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei write for Axios.
from The Rural Blog https://ift.tt/2qw8umc Election results highlight rural-urban divide - Entrepreneur Generations
0 Response to "Election results highlight rural-urban divide - Entrepreneur Generations"
Post a Comment