Rural population loss was mainly from out-migration; international in-migration was more than natual increase - Entrepreneur Generations

Daily Yonder graph
Rural counties as a whole lost population from 2010 to 2020 because people left them, and they gained more from international migration than from natural increase (births totaling more deaths), according to an analysis of new census data by Roberto Gallardo for The Daily Yonder.

 "The decrease from 2010 to 2020 was slight — about half a percentage point," Gallardo writes. But it was apparently the first time an overall decline in rural population -- actual numbers, not percentage -- has been recorded from one census to another. Each year from 2010 to 2015, rural population declined.

Large metropolitan areas also lost population from domestic migration, Gallardo reports. "The international or immigration component buffered population losses in both metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas," he writes. "This highlights the importance of welcoming and helping these groups assimilate into a community’s culture. Without them, population loss would have been higher coupled with the decreasing natural component and in nonmetropolitan areas, domestic migration."

Gallardo's very detailed story includes an interactive table with state-by-state data.


from The Rural Blog https://ift.tt/36Td6I8 Rural population loss was mainly from out-migration; international in-migration was more than natual increase - Entrepreneur Generations

0 Response to "Rural population loss was mainly from out-migration; international in-migration was more than natual increase - Entrepreneur Generations"

Post a Comment