The Sacklers had agreed to pay out $4.5 billion from their personal fortune and forfeit membership of Purdue in exchange for immunity, Hoffman reports. Though the settlement would bring much-needed funding to state, local and tribal governments to address the harms of the opioid epidemic, the settlement has been criticized because it allows the Sacklers to remain wealthy and avoid other legal consequences.
The judge noted that the Sacklers withdrew at least $10 billion from Purdue and put it in offshore accounts to keep it out of reach from American authorities. Those withdrawals sped up after top Purdue executives pleaded guilty in 2007 on criminal and civil charges related to its opioid marketing. That left the company unable to resolve thousands of opioid lawsuits and forced it to declare bankruptcy.
The judge essentially invited a federal appeals court to weigh in on the ruling, writing in her opinion that various appellate courts disagree on the issue and that lower courts need clarity, Hoffman reports. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland weighed in Thursday night, saying in a statement that "The bankruptcy court did not have the authority to deprive victims of the opioid crisis of their right to sue the Sackler family."
from The Rural Blog https://ift.tt/3GVcqSS Judge overturns $4.5B Purdue Pharma opioid settlement because it shields Sacklers from liability in civil cases - Entrepreneur Generations
0 Response to "Judge overturns $4.5B Purdue Pharma opioid settlement because it shields Sacklers from liability in civil cases - Entrepreneur Generations"
Post a Comment