Flitter cites several examples, primarily The Reporter in Delaware County, New York, but does not make clear that the Empire State is one of many that allow public officials to use public-notice ads as a weapon. Many other states require the notices to be published in the newspaper with the largest proven circulation in the officials' jurisdiction, largely eliminating their discretion.
Lawyers told Flitter that it's unconstitutional for governments to punish anyone for their viewpoints, but "Sometimes, it is hard to prove that a local government is revoking a contract because of its unhappiness about a newspaper’s coverage. But other times, the rationale has been more or less explicit." Flitter cites the case of the Wet Mountain Tribune in Custer County, Colorado, which lost the county's public notices after it reported that its new public-health director had questionable educational credentials.
She doesn't note, as Northwestern University did in reporting on the case last year, that the ads went to "a nine-year-old partisan newspaper called the Sangre de Cristo Sentinel even though the Tribune submitted the low bid." But she has an update: "The paper’s publisher, Jordan Hedberg, sued the county in the fall for violating the paper’s First Amendment rights. A federal judge encouraged the two sides to negotiate. In December, the county agreed to reinstate The Tribune’s contract for four years and to pay the paper $50,000 in damages and lawyers’ fees."
from The Rural Blog https://ift.tt/CrI2vFq N.Y. Times spotlights local officials' use of public-notice ads as weapons, but doesn't explain that state laws differ - Entrepreneur Generations
0 Response to "N.Y. Times spotlights local officials' use of public-notice ads as weapons but doesn't explain that state laws differ - Entrepreneur Generations"
Post a Comment